Comments

Sauteed Sweetbreads with Tomatoes and Peas — 2 Comments

  1. Curious how one can use descriptive language that is technically correct either to disparage or praise something. Sweetbreads can be described as “soft”, which leaves it to the reader to decide whether that is good or bad. I would add “satiny soft”, which would make it clear where I stand, Jan adds “mushy” which makes it clear where she stands. “Livery” is not correct if the sweetbreads were in good condition, because “sweet” is part of the name and part of the taste. You would never describe liver, however delicious, as “sweet”. Then Jan adds “organ meat”. It has been already established that it is meat and that it an organ, but Jan’s placement has an obviously derogatory emphasis, which I think is inappropriate when applied to good food. I am not debating taste, with a husband averse to eating fowl I am in a vulnerable position. What I deplore is questioning the merit of any food that so many others admire. Jane sounds as though she would wear a large button saying “I don’t eat organ meats”.