Comments

Sauteed Lamb Kidneys with Onion, Treviso Style — 4 Comments

  1. For most of human history there was not much food about. People ate what they could to keep them alive, and did not waste food that was edible. I suspect some less obviously tasty animal products were normalised within certain cultures as a result of this. But unless you have been brought up with it…

  2. Thanks, Jerry, this made my day. I am right in your camp–all the way. I can not even imagine even making this. I am proud of you!

  3. You are an amusing man, Jerry, but this time I was not amused. I don’t think making fun of any food that has obtained an established place in cuisine through the endorsement of civilized palates is bad manners. And I believe that remarks about running to the toilet or feeding your portion to the cat are juvenile and out of order. Jane may think it is something to be proud of. I do not.
    Marcella – you made me smile. One of the things I find so wonderful about the Italians that I have met over the years is their utter and complete passion for food. I have wittnessed more heated debates over the food that appeared an Italian table than I have about any other topic.
    When we pomodori agreed to work our way through your amazing cookbook we agreed that we would be honest about our adventures. I tried to be very clear that the issue was with me and my tastes and had nothing to do with the recipe. I also try to make light out of most situations.
    There are many foods that have an established place in the culinary tradition of a culture that many of us would find problematic . . . snake . . . monkey . . . scorpion . . . beaver tail (the real tail of a beaver – not the fried pastry version one can find in Ottawa . . .) . . . dog . . . Just because somethng has a well established place on the menu of a people doesn’t mean that the whole lot of us need follow suit nor love it.
    As you know I have a passion for most things Italian – on Saturday I discovered that the ‘odd one out’ is kidneys.
    On to vegetables . . .

  4. My dear Jerry,
    You miss the point, which surprises me in a man careful with words. I don’t take issue with what one likes or doesn’t like. Nothing could be more futile, and my own column of dislikes is far from empty. I take issue with the derisive attitude that many people like Jane, and in this last post, you, manifest toward foods you don’t get. That derisiveness offends the dignity that any element of a valid culinary tradition – whether it is dog, donkey, monkey or scorpion – possesses and the respect that it is entitled to for its role in a cultural tradition.